Incident response
AI incident response under EU AI Act and beyond
Serious incidents must be reported. Your audit log must be tamper-evident. AgenticAssure gives you both — hash-chained evidence and Article 73-aligned workflows.
AI incident response is the structured process to detect, contain, investigate, and report harmful AI system failures — including EU AI Act serious incidents (Article 73) requiring provider notification to market surveillance authorities.
Key takeaways
- EU AI Act Article 73 requires reporting serious incidents and near-misses for high-risk AI.
- Dual hash-chained ledger preserves probe manifests, judge provenance, and runtime decisions for forensics.
- Post-incident, re-run red-team suites to prove remediation before re-deployment.
What counts as a serious incident under the EU AI Act?
Incidents that directly or indirectly lead to death, serious harm, infringement of fundamental rights, or serious property damage. Near-misses with potential for such harm may also require reporting depending on implementation acts.
Questions compliance teams ask
What is a serious incident under the EU AI Act?
A serious incident is an event where a high-risk AI system directly or indirectly causes death, serious injury, harm to fundamental rights, or major property damage. Providers must report to authorities per Article 73.
How does AgenticAssure support incident forensics?
The dual hash-chained ledger records platform events and blockchain-anchored test results. External auditors can verify chain integrity, judge prompts, and RFC3161 timestamps without write access to production.